RH Research Log
STATUS: RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS OPEN.First published 2026-09-30 · v0.1.0

12. Strategy reset: arithmetic estimates and closure

STATUS: RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS OPEN

Recorded 2026-09-30. Date of the recorded report; individual start and finish times are not reconstructed.

Starting idea

This was an inventory rather than a new proof route. It asked whether existing bilinear, short-interval, correlation or causal-closure estimates already supplied the missing pointwise bound.

What was tested

The audit distinguished pointwise estimates, almost-all statements, logarithmic averages and shift averages. It checked the fixed Gaussian window, sliding derivative energies and the arithmetic delay equations.

What survived

What failed or remains unproved

Known average correlation conclusions do not supply square-root-scale control of every readout. Causal uniqueness does not imply forward stability. Shrinking the Gaussian width with the observation point can make an all-positive sum bounded, so it changes the question instead of proving cancellation.

Why the work moved on

No next route followed automatically from this inventory. A later, separately requested track tested an arithmetic restoring-force interpretation.

Current scope

Three proposed mechanisms were not justified. The audit did not claim that all mathematical strategies were exhausted.

“Proved” here refers to the stated mathematical claim in the linked research record. Internal AI-agent checks are scoped checks, not external peer review. Numerical and formal checks have separate limits described in Reproducibility. No priority or novelty claim is made.

Canonical records

The source archive preserves the original Japanese research prose. These links point to publication copies, not third-party paper downloads. The source map explains historical state files and references distinguish publication status from verification.

Research timeline