RH Research Log
STATUS: RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS OPEN.First published 2026-09-30 · v0.1.0

17. Hierarchical selection in fixed derivative families

STATUS: RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS OPEN

Recorded 2026-09-30. Date of the recorded report; individual start and finish times are not reconstructed.

Starting idea

After the leading boundary energy becomes degenerate, do successive terms select k within F_m = span{k,k″,…,k⁽²ᵐ⁾}? The order of operations is the actual projection P_N R_a.

What was tested

The work derived fixed-m support asymptotics, controlled their Gram matrices, compared Fourier resolution with the boundary scale, and separately audited prime rank-one perturbations and Sonin filtrations.

What survived

What failed or remains unproved

Constants and errors are not uniform in growing m. No estimate controls the complementary directions of the full finite matrix. Evenness/simplicity of the relevant full ground states and G* remain missing. Restricted selection is not full ground capture.

Why the work moved on

A separately dated update asked only whether the union of these derivative families is dense in even L². It did not start the later full-ground steps.

Current scope

Fixed finite-m hierarchy established within its stated domain; full ground, growing m and RH remain open.

“Proved” here refers to the stated mathematical claim in the linked research record. Internal AI-agent checks are scoped checks, not external peer review. Numerical and formal checks have separate limits described in Reproducibility. No priority or novelty claim is made.

Canonical records

The source archive preserves the original Japanese research prose. These links point to publication copies, not third-party paper downloads. The source map explains historical state files and references distinguish publication status from verification.

Research timeline